This week the NY Times, along with a number of other newspapers, published an article referencing a Stanford University Department of Medicine study which states that organic food has "no obvious health benefits" over conventional produce and meats. By presenting conventional produce as a safe and equal brother to organic, Stanford is participating in a species of gross misinformation. My editorial article Stanford University Study: Organic vs Conventional/Smoke and Mirrors Fed to the American Public responds to both Stanford and the media's abbreviated portrayal of a complex and multifaceted question. I ask that all my readers take a look and consider the whole picture.
Please Note: the photograph was taken at the San Francisco Farmer's Market